Відео

Beautiful proof

I'm going to talk with the principal to hire you.

Thanks for the explanation !! The concept of splines is really useful .

is RK4 a higher order "Runge kutta method" or it is classical method

Thank you!

2:24

1:00

WHAT IF YOU TAKE THE PARTIAL OF f with respect to u. Or df/ du or f sub u. THEN it's fu.

Awesome explanation, thank you so much

2:00 work is line integral, force. cause mass by. Energy

2:07

5:17

1:00

¿se produce ese desfasaje porque las direncias mumericas leves de discretizacion de la mallas entre distintos puntos se va acentuando a medida que que se itera? y esta diferencia existe en los errores geometricos de los cilindro como minimas asimetrias reales que induces a generas las semillas de las oscilaciones? pero esto no es la explicacion de esto en si, ¿porque debe usarse con Navier Stokes como una receta aspirina para todo tipo de dolor sin ir al medico? ¿realmente esa ecuacion es valida para usarse en estos casos?, A mi juicio se ignoran otros fenomenos para entender este problema, porque se quiere seguir alguna escuela de pensamiento o teoria de fisica

1:00

1:00

1:31 Partialdifferentialeq

5:38

17:20 e**(i theta)

5:21 One of the eigenvalue is positive and the other is negative

3:00

6:20

Thanks

2:49 x(t)=e**rt

It's a shame WW2 spread jews around the way it did.

it was great. thanks a lot

This is not the SOR method! SOR is based on the Gauss-Seidel not on the Jacobi method.

This lecture was extremely easy to understand having followed the previous lectures in the series. Very good

Would you tell me why we have to devide a nought by two

videos are not linked, I don’t see lecture 12. Otherwise, very good presentation. Though, this special case of zeros probably better introduced in other lecture?

Still confused 😪

Thank you professor !!

I can't download the notes.

I was in my first year of a physics degree 20 years ago. I wasn’t that motivated in the field and I changed direction to medicine. Revisiting these topics now is satisfying . These videos are excellent.

I was in my first year of a physics degree 20 years ago but didn’t take it further. I’m enjoying coming back to these concepts and this video was very satisfying .

I was in my first year of a physics degree 20 years ago but didn’t take it further. I’m enjoying coming back to these concepts and this video was very satisfying .

m*n m=number of rows

If we consider about case1 where masses oscillates in same direction then effect system will be a mass at centre with two spring connected at both side, then its a parallel case where k-effective will be k+k=2k then its frequence will be √2k/m ? How

What happens if the pivot equals 0?

Hi thanks for the video ! I just have a question related to the probabilities B x delta t and Gamma x Delta t. If I understand correctly it makes the asumption that the probability that an infective infects a susceptible in a time delta t is proportional to that time delta t. Which would mean the probability would go over 1 in a long time stretch which is impossible. I'm using this model for my final school presentation and I need to be ready to answer these questions :)

Best introduction so far of this concept. Clearly explained and recapped

You look like mike from breaking bad.

Fuck

Thank you

How do you get that the integral is found with W(x) by which method?

Fantastic video ! Thanks a lot, you explain wonderfully !

Thank you

Thanks for uploading these courses.

Unfortunately, I found this playlist -_- A recap of my course. By the way, the intro was awesome.

can someone explain to me why df does not equal to the gradient dot d(theta)? As f also varies with theta!